VerdictUp
Back to treatises
Torts

Torts — Treatise (MBE)

Torts — Treatise (MBE)

Legal treatise · Torts

Big Picture — the test framework at a glance
Torts Big Picture flowchart

Torts MBE Treatise: VerdictUp Study Guide

I. Intentional Torts

General requirements: Act (volitional movement), Intent (specific: purpose to cause result; general: substantial certainty of result), and Causation (substantial factor). Transferred Intent applies only to Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, Trespass to Land, and Trespass to Chattels.

Core Torts

  1. Battery: Harmful/offensive contact with P’s person. Tip: Offensive means unpermitted by reasonable sense of dignity.
  2. Assault: Act creating reasonable apprehension of immediate harmful/offensive contact. Tip: Mere words are rarely sufficient without overt action.
  3. False Imprisonment: Confinement of P in bounded area without reasonable means of escape. Tip: Moral pressure is not confinement; physical barriers or threats are required.
  4. IIED: Extreme/outrageous conduct causing severe emotional distress. Tip: Requires more than mere insults; needs conduct exceeding all bounds of decency.

Property Torts

  1. Trespass to Land: Physical invasion of P’s land. Tip: Intent to enter is enough, even if D mistakenly believes land is theirs.
  2. Trespass to Chattels: Minor interference with P’s possessory interest. Tip: Requires actual damage or dispossession.
  3. Conversion: Intentional interference so serious it justifies forced sale. Tip: Measure damages by the full fair market value at the time of conversion.

Defenses

  • Necessity: Public necessity is an absolute defense; Private necessity allows entry but D must pay for damages. Tip: Private necessity is an incomplete privilege.
  • Self-Defense/Defense of Others: Reasonable belief of immediate danger. Tip: No duty to retreat unless in a minority jurisdiction.

II. Negligence

Negligence accounts for roughly 50% of MBE questions.

Elements

  1. Duty: Foreseeable plaintiffs (see Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.). Standard: Reasonably prudent person (RPP).
  2. Breach: Failure to meet standard of care. Use res ipsa loquitur where the accident speaks for itself.
  3. Causation: Actual (but-for) and Proximate (foreseeability). Tip: Intervening acts that are foreseeable do not break the chain of causation.
  4. Damages: Actual loss required.

Special Standards

  • Negligence Per Se: Statutory violation establishes duty and breach if P is in the protected class and the harm is the type the statute aimed to prevent.
  • Land Occupier: Trespassers (no duty to unknown, warn of known man-made traps for anticipated), Licensees (warn of known dangers), Invitees (inspect and make safe). See Rowland v. Christian for the shift toward unified standards.
  • NIED: Zone of danger or bystander test (Dillon v. Legg).

III. Strict Liability & Products Liability

Strict Liability

  • Wild Animals: Strict liability for all injuries.
  • Abnormally Dangerous Activities: Factors include high risk and inability to eliminate risk with care. Tip: Liability is limited to the harm caused by the dangerous aspect.

Products Liability

  • Negligence: Manufacturers/suppliers liable for design or manufacturing flaws. See MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
  • Strict Liability in Tort: Focus on the product, not the defendant's conduct. Requires (1) commercial supplier, (2) defective product (manufacturing, design, or warning), (3) causation, (4) damages. Tip: A "learned intermediary" defense applies to prescription drugs.

IV. Other Torts

  • Defamation: Statement of fact, publication, falsity, fault. Public figures must prove actual malice (New York Times Co. v. Sullivan). Tip: Libel (written) allows general damages; slander (spoken) often requires proof of special damages.
  • Invasion of Privacy: Intrusion on seclusion, false light, appropriation, disclosure of private facts. Tip: Truth is generally not a defense to disclosure of private facts.
  • Nuisance: Private (substantial, unreasonable interference with use/enjoyment of land) vs. Public (act unreasonable interfering with health/safety of community).

V. General Considerations

  • Vicarious Liability: Respondeat superior for employees acting in scope of employment. Independent contractors generally do not trigger liability unless non-delegable duty or apparent agency exists.
  • Joint & Several Liability: Any tortfeasor can be held liable for the entire damage amount. Tip: Contribution allows a D who paid more than their share to seek reimbursement.
  • Survival/Wrongful Death: Survival actions belong to the decedent’s estate; wrongful death belongs to the family for their losses.

Rapid Review

  • Transferred intent applies only to the five original trespassory torts.
  • Battery needs contact; Assault needs apprehension.
  • Landlord is liable for known, non-obvious dangers to licensees.
  • Res ipsa loquitur shifts the burden of production, not persuasion.
  • Products liability: Misuse is a defense if it is unforeseeable.
  • Actual malice means knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard.
  • Comparative negligence reduces recovery; contributory negligence bars it.
  • Public necessity is a total defense; private is qualified.
  • Independent contractors: No liability for the employer unless the work is inherently dangerous.
  • Negligence per se is a rule of law, not just evidence.
  • Assumption of risk can be express or implied.
  • Survival actions preserve claims that existed during the victim's life.

Master Outline Add-On: Torts

  • Intentional torts. Battery needs intent to cause harmful or offensive contact and contact; assault needs reasonable apprehension of imminent contact. Exam cue: Intent to contact is not intent to injure.
  • Other intentional torts. False imprisonment, trespass, conversion, and IIED have distinct elements and defenses. Exam cue: Discuss consent and privilege.
  • Negligence. Duty, breach, actual and proximate cause, and damages. Exam cue: Organize by element, not chronology.
  • Standards of care. The reasonable-person standard is modified for professionals, children, land possessors, and statutory violations. Exam cue: Negligence per se does not automatically prove causation.
  • Proof and causation. Res ipsa permits an inference in qualifying cases; but-for and substantial-factor tests address factual cause. Exam cue: Distinguish foreseeable intervening causes from superseding ones.
  • Defenses. Comparative or contributory fault and assumption of risk can reduce or bar recovery. Exam cue: State the jurisdiction's fault system if given.
  • Vicarious liability. Employers answer for employees acting in scope; special and nondelegable duties can reach contractors. Exam cue: Also look for the employer's own negligence.
  • Products liability. Manufacturing defects, design defects, and inadequate warnings support strict liability, alongside negligence and warranty. Exam cue: Separate defect, causation, and defenses.
  • Defamation and privacy. Defamation needs a false defamatory statement of fact, publication, fault, and injury, with constitutional limits for public figures and public concern. Exam cue: Analyze actual malice where it applies.

Self-test: For each topic above, recite the elements, name one exception, and write a two-sentence fact application.

Essay checklist: parties and claims; governing authority; elements; exceptions and defenses; burden; remedy; strongest opposing argument.